Shadowing the White Man’s Burden

U.S. Imperialism and the Problem of the Color Line

288 pages

5 illustrations

May, 2010

ISBN: 9780814795996

$27

Paper

Also available in

Author

Gretchen Murphy is Associate Professor of English at the University of Texas-Austin. She is the author of Hemispheric Imaginings: The Monroe Doctrine and Narratives of U.S. Empire.

All books by Gretchen Murphy

During the height of 19th century imperialism, Rudyard Kipling published his famous poem “The White Man’s Burden.” While some of his American readers argued that the poem served as justification for imperialist practices, others saw Kipling’s satirical talents at work and read it as condemnation. Gretchen Murphy explores this tension embedded in the notion of the white man’s burden to create a new historical frame for understanding race and literature in America.

Shadowing the White Man’s Burden maintains that literature symptomized and channeled anxiety about the racial components of the U.S. world mission, while also providing a potentially powerful medium for multiethnic authors interested in redrawing global color lines. Through a range of archival materials from literary reviews to diplomatic records to ethnological treatises, Murphy identifies a common theme in the writings of African-, Asian- and Native-American authors who exploited anxiety about race and national identity through narratives about a multiracial U.S. empire. Shadowing the White Man’s Burden situates American literature in the context of broader race relations, and provides a compelling analysis of the way in which literature came to define and shape racial attitudes for the next century.

Reviews

  • “This impressive book, which is based on extensive archival research, shows how the transformation of racial categories at the turn of the 20th century was a multidirectional process that often generated new meanings. Murphy reveals how multiple imperial histories shaped changing ideas about race and how readers and writers who engaged the trope of the white man’s burden exposed contradictory ideas about whiteness as a domestic and transnational racial construct. Shadowing the White Man’s Burden is part of an exciting new body of work on race in transnational contexts. It is one of the best accounts we have of the significance of literature in transformations of and contests over race in this period.”

    —Shelley Streeby, author of American Sensations: Class, Empire, and the Production of Popular Culture

  • "This beautifully argued and engaging literary history addresses a fairly simple question: How did the distinctive multiracial nature of the United States transform that country's sense of itself as an empire? The result is a fascinating and rewarding book worth reading closely and carefully."

    —Matthew Pratt Guterl, The Journal of American History

  • "Gretchen Murphy's new book is a compelling work that synthesizes critical race theory and U.S. empire studies to produce an original analysis of whiteness in national and international contexts . . . Shadowing the White Man's Burden is a valuable book that makes an important contribution to the growing body of work on U.S. imperialism. Scholars interested in the topic would do well to attend to this remarkable achievement."

    —Harilaos Stecopoulos, American Historical Review

  • "Murphy's analysis has much to offer to scholars in the humanities...Shadowing the White Man's Burden is an exciting contribution to transnational analysis, African American Studies, and a welcome gift to scholars in various fields interested in deconstructing concepts of race and nation in the modern era."

    Journal of African American History

  • “Through a careful and attentive comparative analysis of literature and history, [Murphy] demonstrates the constructed nature of race in the imperialist mind and shows that, for many, the United States was never able to fix its own “white” identity strongly enough to fully participate in the ‘white man’s burden,’ but with every foray into international empire-building, it opened itself up to internal scrutiny about its own racial heterogeneity.”

    Journal of American Ethnic History